

In the end, it all comes out in the wash. Those of us who have been watching in horror as the Brexit brainwashing has been played out were wondering what sort of forces have been behind it all. We always knew there was likely Russian influence on the actual referendum itself. But now we’re also seeing a distinct US flavour to the brainwashing behind the current politics of it. On Friday last, the US Ambassador to the UK came out with a few strongly worded statements to the effect that the UK should abandon EU standards and open itself up to low grade US food imports. As blatant an intervention as it was astonishing.
And within it lies more of the truth about some of the actual forces behind the whole fiasco. It makes it clear that the US is hopeful of capitalising on British desperation around the economics of Brexit in order to be able to dump it’s food into Britain. This is obviously completely contrary to the interests of British farming as well as infuriating those who care about British food standards. Ultimately it would seem obvious that this will never “wash” politically. But if that is the tactic which the hard Brexiters are relying on in order to be able to keep food prices reasonable post Brexit, it seems to be in incredibly short sighted to be keeping their electorate in the dark about it. In other words, they’re prepared to obfuscate and confuse people, releasing contradictory misleading statements by Ministers Fox and Gove, and meanwhile the brash and tactless US Ambassador comes out with his intervention – sort of cutting to the chase and letting the cat out of the bag. It’s hard to imagine the history books looking favourably on this type of political expediency – screwing around with food quality so that the food economics around Brexit don’t cause a complete short-term political shit-storm which is what it obviously otherwise would without a trade deal with the US, heavily weighted in favour of the US farmer.
All amounting to yet more astonishing stupidity and bad judgement whether that resides in Westminster, the general UK electorate or both. Like why is the US Ambassador so confident of not drawing out a damaging back-lash against his statements? How are the British Farmers taking this lying down? The answer is, that one thing that is no longer in doubt is the depths of the dumbness that’s out there. It’s hard to imagine that the UK and possibly everywhere is engaged in an intellectual race to the bottom, where the more ridiculously flawed the political line you adopt, whether anti-semitism in the UK Labour party, whether support for Trump, whether support for Brexit, the more appealing it is to a public full of numbties.
By extension therefore, if you seek to make a case for something that has a clearly defined logic to it, such as climate change action, you have to start by neutralising the arguments of the dopes who’ll argue against you. Maybe that’s what Theresa May has been doing all these months.
From an Irish perspective, there is a sense these days that the Withdrawal Agreement vote will probably pass. There will probably be assurances given on the backstop, a cliff-edge will be avoided and the whole process will move on to the next stage. Maybe that won’t be the worst thing for Ireland. Maybe the avoidance of the Brexit shock is the thing that we need more than anything, not the avoidance of any Brexit at all. Maybe UK business’ loss is very likely to be Ireland’s gain. Maybe the punishment for their being so hell-bent on their own destruction is the loss of stability for business, which makes Ireland look more attractive, the so-called Brexit bounce. In that instance, the longer and deeper the stupidity and lack of clariy, the bigger the bounce should be in Ireland’s favour. But first the cliff edge of no deal has to be eliminated.
